[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2014-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2014-01-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2014-01-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2014-01-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2014-01-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- junit-benchmarks-0.7.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/junit-benchmarks-0.7.2-1.fc20 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2014-01-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2013-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 --- Comment #4 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3) (In reply to Gerard Ryan from comment #2) I'm not sure if the new Github releases feature makes it unnecessary (not sure how it works), but

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2013-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2013-12-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ger...@ryan.lt

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2013-12-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2013-12-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 --- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt --- I'm not sure if the new Github releases feature makes it unnecessary (not sure how it works), but consider using the full commit hash to refer to the sources, as advised here, for immutability

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2013-12-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- (In reply to Gerard Ryan from comment #2) I'm not sure if the new Github releases feature makes it unnecessary (not sure how it works), but consider using the full commit hash to refer

[Bug 1002166] Review Request: junit-benchmarks - Code benchmarking in JUnit4

2013-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002166 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1002170 -- You are