https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
Ryan O'Hara roh...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #18 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Pádraig Brady from comment #6)
I don't think this warrants a split to subpackages at this time.
The main driver for splitting id dependency reduction which this would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #19 from Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com ---
Well this should not be blocking.
If we need to split in future, we can by changing the top level package to one
that requires the sub packages.
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #14 from Ryan O'Hara roh...@redhat.com ---
It appears the git repo didn't get created. I'm unable to clone
openstack-puppet-modules and I see no repo on pkgs.fedoraproject.org. Perhaps
I'm missing something?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Sorry, not sure what happened, should be fine now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #17 from Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com ---
Actually package only contains files in /usr/share/puppet/modules/...
and that does seem sensible on the face of it.
I've confirmed the git repo is now available.
thanks.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #12 from Ryan O'Hara roh...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Pádraig Brady from comment #7)
This should be called openstack-puppet-modules rather than just
openstack-puppet I think? The former component is already created in bz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@draigbrady.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
No SCM request found.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #9 from Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com ---
looks good to me
= MUST items =
Generic:
[X]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
Note: Using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
17 matches
Mail list logo
