https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #27 from Timothy St. Clair ---
@Ratnadeep -
Yup.
Perhaps we should open a new ticket given that mesos is already in f21 and out
the door.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla ---
No owners specified.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #25 from Ratnadeep Debnath ---
Hey Timothy,
Could you please elaborate on what do you mean by "drag in the missing
transitive dependencies"? During the build, I saw some extra packages being
downloaded and installed by maven. Are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #24 from Timothy St. Clair ---
Ratnadeep you would need to drag in the missing transitive dependencies into
epel in order to make that happen.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Ratnadeep Debnath changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rtn...@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Dennis Gilmore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #22 from Dennis Gilmore ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
bigdata-sig is not a valid FAS account.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #19 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Will Benton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #18 from Wil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #17 from Timothy St. Clair ---
Updated, same URLs. Notes are inlined below.
> - mesos must BuildRequire: python2-devel. See
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires
- done
> - The spec must work from a p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #16 from Will Benton ---
(In reply to Timothy St. Clair from comment #15)
> updated, with same urls.
>
> You will notice I conditionalized the .spec file around that.
I did! Thanks for changing the default behavior; you can re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #15 from Timothy St. Clair ---
updated, with same urls.
You will notice I conditionalized the .spec file around that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #14 from Will Benton ---
The generated tarball policy doesn't apply in this case if there is nothing in
the upstream tarball that we're legally encumbered from uploading to SCM.
Please move the bundled library deletion to your %pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #13 from Timothy St. Clair ---
stout is now retired as a separate package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #12 from Timothy St. Clair ---
Update includes a generate-tarball.sh mod with switched to dual purpose the
spec file, in the vain that some day we can just pull directly from github.
ref:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #11 from Timothy St. Clair ---
> I will need to remove any other sub-packages that exist.
from fedora respos
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #10 from Timothy St. Clair ---
Updated, I believe I've addressed all the items listed above. I've removed the
sub-packaging too, as it doesn't exist anywhere else. I will need to remove
any other sub-packages that exist.
srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #9 from Timothy St. Clair ---
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
mesos-devel should own %{includedir}/mesos. Currently stout and
libprocess are in there as well, but these probably shouldn't be.
[
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #8 from Will Benton ---
We also need to work from a pristine source and a patchset. Since the delta
between upstream and Tim's fork is very large (primarily due to removing
binaries), the package should probably remove binaries in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #7 from Will Benton ---
Some issues here, but the most serious one is bundling. (It basically doesn't
matter that upstream is bundling.)
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Will Benton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|bjoern.es...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #6 from Timothy St. Clair ---
updated spec: http://tstclair.fedorapeople.org/mesos/mesos.spec
updated srpm:
http://tstclair.fedorapeople.org/mesos/mesos-0.16.0-1.d3557e8.fc21.src.rpm
Notes:
mesos.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(bjoern.esser@gmai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
--- Comment #5 from Timothy St. Clair ---
Any update?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1010003 (bigdata-review)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com,
35 matches
Mail list logo
