[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.r

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedo

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- datanucleus-api-jdo-3.2.6-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datanucleus-api-jdo-3.2.6-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 Bug 1011962 depends on bug 1011705, which changed state. Bug 1011705 Summary: Review Request: datanucleus-core - Java persistence abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705 What|Removed

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component __

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 Pete MacKinnon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Pete

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 --- Comment #5 from Pete MacKinnon --- Injected ASL2 license headers and registered upstream JIRA: SPEC URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/datanucleus/datanucleus-api-jdo.spec SRPM URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/datanucleus/datanucl

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-revie

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i | |t)

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 Pete MacKinnon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- check out these ISSUES: [?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags|

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 --- Comment #1 from Pete MacKinnon --- Updated to latest (3.2.6): SPEC URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/datanucleus/datanucleus-api-jdo.spec SRPM URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/datanucleus/datanucleus-api-jdo-3.2.6-1.fc20.src.rpm

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 Bug 1011962 depends on bug 1011696, which changed state. Bug 1011696 Summary: Review Request: jdo-api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011696 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) -- You are receiv

[Bug 1011962] Review Request: datanucleus-api-jdo - plugin for JDO support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011962 Pete MacKinnon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Hardware|