[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- I moved it back to -devel. Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/otf2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/otf2-1.2.1-4.fc19.src.rpm * Thu Oct 24 2013

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- (In reply to Jerry James from comment #3) I will take this review. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com --- Okay, looks great. The only remaining possible issue I see is this comment from rpmlint: otf2.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/otf2-config I don't know if that is

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-10-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- * Wed Oct 2 2013 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 1.2.1-2 - Fix rpath with configure change http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/otf2.spec

[Bug 1013037] Review Request: otf2 - Open Trace Format 2 library

2013-09-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013037 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1013836 -- You