https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|rubygem-ruby-openid-2.3.0-3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-ruby-openid-2.3.0-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ruby-openid-2.3.0-3.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-ruby-openid-2.3.0-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ruby-openid-2.3.0-3.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #10 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
Thanks for the review!
I've filed bug 1024122 for the PNG images in rubygem-rdoc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #8 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
(As a correction to comment #6: my license clarification request is at
https://github.com/openid/ruby-openid/issues/64, not 60.)
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #7)
* Note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
For -2
* Obsoletes
- What I said before is meant that Obsoletes lines must
be changed to Obsoletes: ruby-openid = 2.1.7-11,
for example (i.e. not = but =)
* License
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #6 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
Thanks, I've filed https://github.com/openid/ruby-openid/issues/60 about the
license question. I'm also excluding the test directory as you suggest, so we
hopefully avoid the issue.
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Initial notes:
* License
- It seems that the correct license tag for -doc subpackage
should be ASL 2.0 and LGPLv2+ and MIT. Would you
check this? (see attached)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 813204
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=813204action=edit
license analysis result
My license analysis result
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #5 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Additional notes:
* Test suite files
- Current ruby guidelines says not to include files under
test/ into binary rpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #1 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint rubygem-ruby-openid-2.3.0-1.fc21.src.rpm rubygem-ruby-openid.spec
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
F21 scratch build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||903854
Referenced
20 matches
Mail list logo