https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|rubygem-capillary-1.0.3-3.f |rubygem-capillary-1.0.3-3.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-capillary-1.0.3-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-capillary-1.0.3-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-capillary-1.0.3-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-capillary-1.0.3-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Ken Drey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
"ruby-sig" is not a valid FAS account.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Ken Drey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #5 from Ken Dreyer ---
You're quite right. I didn't realize that the gemspec doesn't use double
quotation marks once we regenerate it. Thanks.
I've adjusted the first sed regex, and removed the second sed operation (now
that the f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
For -2:
* About excluding /usr/bin/ruby dependency
- Well, I don't oppose to this (i.e. not a blocker),
however I don't think
adding this line makes so much sense...
We don't explicitly exc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #3 from Ken Dreyer ---
Thanks very much for the review. I've incorporated all your recommended changes
in Release 2.
Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-capillary.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
By the way I would appreciate it if you would review one of my review requests
(e.g. bug 904640 )
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016370
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
18 matches
Mail list logo
