https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: ghc-primes |Review Request: ghc-primes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt ---
Updated Package:
SPEC file: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ghc-primes/ghc-primes.spec
SRPM file:
http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ghc-primes/ghc-primes-0.2.1.0-2.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen ---
I think you forgot to update the SPEC url.
The license is not MIT I think.
I opened this upstream issue
https://github.com/sebfisch/primes/issues/2
since the License file seems to same Public Domain
even
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen ---
Created attachment 813218
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=813218&action=edit
1-ghc-primes.spec.patch
I was suggesting something like these changes in my earlier comments
(plus License
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt ---
Updated Release:
SPEC file: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ghc-primes/ghc-primes.spec
SRPM-file
http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ghc-primes/ghc-prime-0.2.1.0-3.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen ---
Thanks for the update.
BTW:
%if 0%{?fedora} > 19
rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_docdir}/%{name}/LICENSE
%else
rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE
%endif
you can use %{_pkgdocdir} for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Je
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen ---
(Still curious what you want to use this for in Fedora?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jochen Schmitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Joc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
WARNING: "haskell-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org" is not a valid FAS account.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen ---
Jochen please use "haskell-sig" for InitialCC, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jochen Schmitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Joc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
Jochen Schmitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
17 matches
Mail list logo
