https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ardour3-3.5.74-2.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ardour3-3.5.74-2.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #24 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com ---
I concur with Björn why the autofoo files may be not quite up to date. Anyway,
this is an artifact of not having official tarballs (which would contain a
configure script unlike the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #26 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com ---
I've notified Robin Gareus and he'll look into the autotools thing:
https://github.com/x42/libltc/issues/9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libltc-1.1.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libltc-1.1.2-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libltc-1.1.2-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libltc-1.1.2-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libltc-1.1.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libltc-1.1.2-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #19 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com ---
The culprit is scl-utils-build (if it's installed) and I've filed bug #1023625
for it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #20 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com ---
Here's 1.1.2 with the HTML development documentation:
Spec URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/libltc/libltc.spec
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #22 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #21)
AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found
--
AM_PROG_LIBTOOL found in: libltc-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
I cannot reproduce it with F19 either.
Package rpm-build requires package pkgconfig, so /usr/bin/pkg-config is
available always. Only if I break the dependency and erase
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #18 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Just for reference (and instead of submitting a koji scratch-build), here's a
package for F19 with a .pc file that contains no Requires line but results in
proper automatic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #13 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Björn besser82 Esser from comment #12)
(In reply to Nils Philippsen from comment #11)
Uhm why? I don't see a guideline prescribing that and so that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Unexpected. Which version of package rpm-build is that with?
The file /usr/lib/rpm/pkgconfigdeps.sh hasn't changed between F19 and F20, and:
$ rpm -qpR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #15 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com ---
This is rpm-build-4.11.1-3.fc19.x86_64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Hmm...Weird. I think there might have a bug. I get the same result like Nils,
but I think RPM can handle this well.
@Michael, what is it about that filing a bug for rpmbuild?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Isn't the timestamp in footer issue fixed at Fedora since doxygen-1.8.1.1-2
(Jun 13 2012), which sets HTML_TIMESTAMP default to FALSE? Please confirm.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #7)
Isn't the timestamp in footer issue fixed at Fedora since doxygen-1.8.1.1-2
(Jun 13 2012), which sets HTML_TIMESTAMP default to FALSE?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
It is fixed, but gumbo-parser uses a 75 KB Doxyfile that overrides lots of
settings, including the HTML_TIMESTAMP setting.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
And libltc also does that. ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Please package 1.1.2.(https://github.com/x42/libltc/releases)
Please remove Requires: pkgconfig in -devel subpkg.
Then I will run again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Hmm.. You should request upstream to provide 1.1.2 download if possible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Help submmited:
https://github.com/x42/libltc/issues/8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
36 matches
Mail list logo
