[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.el6

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-12-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.fc19

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.fc18

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.el6 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBD-ODBC-1.45-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Jan Holcapek holca...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 --- Comment #7 from Jan Holcapek holca...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #6) 0.) Please split a long line: -%doc Changes FAQ if_you_are_taking_over_this_code.txt README README.adabas README.af README.hpux

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk --- * Package named correctly * Latest stable version used * Package licensed correctly * License tag correct * SPEC file mostly clean and legible (see below) * Correct compiler flags used *

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Jan Holcapek holca...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 --- Comment #3 from Jan Holcapek holca...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2) SPEC URL is not the same one in SRPM. Dunno why you used a repoforge SPEC link. My bad:

[Bug 1028521] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Jan Holcapek from comment #3) (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2) SPEC URL is not the same one in SRPM. Dunno why you used a repoforge SPEC link. My