https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-3.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #69 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #70 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #71 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #72 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #73 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #74 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #67 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Chris Smart fed...@christophersmart.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|fed...@christophersmart.com |
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #63 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
i will add /sbin/ldconfig to the spec file again, because of:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Shared_Libraries
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #60 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #59)
-
1. Filter out libnuvolaplayerprivate.so.
(Michael Schwendt from comment #39)
The libnuvolaplayerprivate.so is a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #61 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
3. Why does this package invoke ldconfig?
man ldconfig explains what the command does.
$ yum localinstall nuvolaplayer-2.4.2-4.fc21.x86_64.rpm
[...]
$ ldconfig -p|grep nuv
$
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #62 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #61)
3. Why does this package invoke ldconfig?
man ldconfig explains what the command does.
$ yum localinstall
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #59 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #56 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
1. Drop unique, it's not needed since 2.0, not sure why you added(fault?)?
2. FTBFS:
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.wKqPtm
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #57 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
bug reported upstream
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nuvola-player/+bug/1363381
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #58 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.4.2-3.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sat Aug 30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #55 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ua1hj7yv1mll9j3/nuvolaplayer.spec?dl=0
SRPM URL:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/86ge8s5u38nlgi8/nuvolaplayer-2.4.2-2.fc20.src.rpm?dl=0
%changelog
* Fri Aug 29
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #54 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
1. %{_libexecdir}/nuvolaplayer/webkitgtkframe
-
%{_libexecdir}/nuvolaplayer/
2. Where is libsoup-devel?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bjoern.es...@gmail.com |i...@cicku.me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bjoern.esser@gmai |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #51 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.4.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
Fri Jul 18 2014 Martin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #50 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.4.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Tue Jul 08
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #49 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
have someone time and can do the review ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mgans...@alice.de |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #45 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
testsuite fails in mockbuild with nuvolaplayer-2.4.0 on Fedora 20.
reported upstream.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nuvola-player/+bug/1327500
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #46 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name ---
While waiting for upstream, perhaps you can figure out a way to separate the
build process from the test process?
Tests are normally run in the %check section -- another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #47 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #44)
there must be something changed when changing from version 2.3.3 to 2.4.0.
I'll ask upstream.
mock logfiles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #48 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.4.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
Fix committed to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #42 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
@björn
Do you mind if assign the review somebody else.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #41 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.4.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
%changelog
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #36 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Issues:
===
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #37 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #36)
Issues:
===
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files directly in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #38 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
I asked upstream, here is the answer:
https://answers.launchpad.net/nuvola-player/+question/249469
Jiří Janoušek (fenryxo)
%libdir%/libnuvolaplayerprivate.so is installed as a symlink to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #39 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Well, %excluding a file that is a symlink target makes no sense, because that
breaks the symlink. ;) rpmls nuvolaplayer would be one convenient command to
examine the file types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #40 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #39)
Well, %excluding a file that is a symlink target makes no sense, because
that breaks the symlink. ;) rpmls nuvolaplayer would be one
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||methe...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #34 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.3.3-1.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Tue May 04
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #32 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.3.2-2.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Tue Apr 15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #33 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Created attachment 886554
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=886554action=edit
fc21 nuvolaplayer mock build-log
@björn
nuvolaplayer builds now on rawhide.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #31 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.3.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Wed Mar 26
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Bug 1039315 depends on bug 1067859, which changed state.
Bug 1067859 Summary: webkitgk3 crash detected in nuvola player testsuite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067859
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1067859 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #29 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Created attachment 85
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=85action=edit
F21 mock build log
mock build fails on fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #30 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #29)
Created attachment 85 [details]
F21 mock build log
mock build fails on fc21
bug already reported upstream:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #27 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.3.1-2.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sat Mar 22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #28 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.3.1-3.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sat Mar 22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #26 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.3.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Fri Mar 21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1067859
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #24 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
New Informations from the developer of nuvola player
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nuvola-player/+bug/1263705/comments/11
...
Anyway, the crashes seems to occur inside webkitgtk and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #25 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
hi guys,
please could you test the version 2.3.0, i've only test this version on
vmware. I know it's not revision 805.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #23 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
last information of the developer of nuvola-player
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nuvola-player/+bug/1263705/comments/6
I've made a few improvements. Currently, I cannot reproduce crash in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #22 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #21)
2.3.0 has come out.
yes I know that a new version has been released, but the problem (comment #21)
persists.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #21 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
2.3.0 has come out.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #18 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Created attachment 840748
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=840748action=edit
F20 mock build log without tests
mock builds with the following command:
mock --without=tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #19 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 840798
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=840798action=edit
valgrind.log -- Tracing the reason for failing testsuite in mock
Running
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #20 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
bureport with summary: testsuite segfaults because of unintialized values
posted upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/nuvola-player/+bug/1263705
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #17 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Hi Björn you are welcome
i added bcond to make unit tests switchable.
the spec file is available on
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/test/nuvolaplayer.spec
the package builds without
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #14 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me ---
I suppose the tests are actually run at %install, not %build, because the tests
still fail when building under mock with -7:
FAIL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me ---
Created attachment 837513
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=837513action=edit
F20 mock build log for -7
On closer look, the tests are being run as part
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #9 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7)
3. Why --skip-tests?
because it fails, the message is:
/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/nuvolaplayer-2.2.0/build/tests/bin/main: FAILED
TEST:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #11 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.2.0-6.fc19.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sun Dec 15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #12 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7)
6. Sources tarball contains 2 dirs: external/ and licenses/ , please double
check them.
do you mean the different license types ?, how can i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #13 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.2.0-7.fc19.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sun Dec 15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|cicku...@gmail.com |
--- Comment #7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #6 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.2.0-5.fc19.src.rpm
%changelog
* Wed Dec 11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #5 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #4)
The package has been tested on the dependence of java-1.7.0-openjdk, it is
not necessary for the functionality.
attached is the answer from the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #4 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
The package has been tested on the dependence of java-1.7.0-openjdk, it is
not necessary for the functionality.
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1679298postcount=14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #3 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.2.0-4.fc19.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sun Dec 08
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Cloud Music |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #1 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
Created attachment 833993
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=833993action=edit
spec file diff to fix owned directory and and python version
Fixes
[ ]: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #2 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
Created attachment 834005
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=834005action=edit
more fixes
I have fixed the broken symlink
83 matches
Mail list logo
