https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
Paul Flo Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@frixxon.co.uk
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
1) I will suggest to use following release tag
Release Tag for Pre-Release Packages: 0.%{X}.%{alphatag}
and version tag as 1.01
So, package name is google-android-emoji-fonts-1.01-0.1.20120228
2) It too
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #4 from Peter Oliver ---
Spec URL: http://mavit.fedorapeople.org/rpm/google-android-emoji-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mavit.fedorapeople.org/rpm/google-android-emoji-fonts-1.01-1.20120228git.fc21.src.rpm
Having consulted
https://f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
1) Please use the recommended way of naming release tags
Pre-Release Packages: 0.%{X}.%{alphatag}
2) I take NOTICE is a duplication of README.txt file. README file clearly says
License URL and fonts in t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Group tag is not mandatory now so you can remove that also.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #7 from Peter Oliver ---
Could you explain why that is the appropriate release tag? As I understand it,
this is a "post-release package" rather than a "pre-release package", as
described at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
I asked this release tag issue on packaging list and got reply to clarify with
upstream about what they think. Here is that reply
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2014-January/009919.ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #9 from Peter Oliver ---
Thanks.
I'm convinced. Android don't do tarball releases, they just tag the release in
git. What I hadn't considered before was that that's a release of Android as a
whole, not a release of this font. S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
Peter Oliver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Peter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
Peter Oliver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
google-android-emoji-fonts-1.01-0.1.20120228git.fc19 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-android-emoji-fonts-1.01-0.1.20120228git.fc19
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
google-android-emoji-fonts-1.01-0.1.20120228git.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-android-emoji-fonts-1.01-0.1.20120228git.fc20
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||google-android-emoji-fonts-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|google-android-emoji-fonts- |google-android-emoji-fonts-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
Bryan Yount changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||byo...@redhat.com
--- Comment #18 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076
--- Comment #19 from Peter Oliver ---
(In reply to Bryan Yount from comment #18)
> Is it possible to get this font (or the discussed upstream replacement)
> included in a default Desktop install of Fedora?
I've asked about this in
https://lis
20 matches
Mail list logo
