https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vdr-skinnopacity-1.0.3-7.20131221git0b29805.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vdr-skinnopacity-1.0.3-6.20131221git0b29805.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #8 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Rahul Sundaram from comment #6)
rpmlint complains about the use of macro in the changelog. so you might
want to drop % or use %%
done
license according to the README is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #9 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Rahul Sundaram from comment #7)
Also Fedora licensing guideline recommend that source files should have
copyright headers clearly stating the author and licensing detail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
f21 not branched yet, devel is automatic.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vdr-skinnopacity-1.0.3-5.20131221git0b29805.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #5 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Rahul Sundaram from comment #4)
Cursory first look:
* Is there any particular reason the conf file is not part of upstream?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com ---
rpmlint complains about the use of macro in the changelog. so you might want
to drop % or use %%
license according to the README is GPLv2+ and not GPL+
/etc/vdr/themes/ doesn't seem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com ---
Also Fedora licensing guideline recommend that source files should have
copyright headers clearly stating the author and licensing detail although this
isn't a blocker, I would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
17 matches
Mail list logo
