https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1025904 (solr)
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
jetty8-8.1.14-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jetty8-8.1.14-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Pete MacKinnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Pet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Will Benton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Wil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Will Benton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #12 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Spec URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/jetty8/jetty8.spec
SRPM URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/jetty8/jetty8-8.1.14-1.fc21.src.rpm
Mikolaj's version with %{_javadir}/jetty8 in %files.
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #11 from Will Benton ---
OK, the iconv is acceptable. Add %{_javadir}/jetty8 to %files and I'll approve
the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #10 from Will Benton ---
Thanks, Mikolaj! Here's my review; the only thing I'm waiting on is a
clarification as to whether or not running iconv on the CDDL text constitutes
an impermissible license patch. (This is just the sort o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mizdebsk@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Will Benton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mizdebsk@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #7 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Thanks for the improvements. I don't even recognize it anymore! The current
jetty 9 spec should enjoy such a makeover.
Will, assuming that it is OK to let go of the changelog history, moving to a
monolit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
My proposed spec file which is much simpler and contains only required modules.
http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/review/jetty8/jetty8.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #5 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Spec URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/jetty8/jetty8.spec
SRPM URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/jetty8/jetty8-8.1.14-4.fc21.src.rpm
mvn_compat_version hardcoded to include current version but wi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #4 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Spec URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/jetty8/jetty8.spec
SRPM URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/jetty8/jetty8-8.1.14-3.fc21.src.rpm
Further updated for (hopefully) correct usage of mvn_compat_ve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #3 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Spec URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/jetty8/jetty8.spec
SRPM URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/jetty8/jetty8-8.1.14-2.fc21.src.rpm
1) You should use %mvn_install to install artifacts.
DONE
2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mizde...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
--- Comment #1 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Should be built as:
rpmbuild -ba --without osgi --without nosql jetty8.spec
osgi,nosql support are left in as conditionals for the time being.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Pete MacKinnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wi...@redhat.com
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Matthew Farrellee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@redhat.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057670
Pete MacKinnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: jetty8 -|Review Request: jetty8 -
27 matches
Mail list logo
