[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-05-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Jan Sedlák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-05-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- python-aniso8601-0.82-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-05-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-aniso8601-0.82-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-aniso8601-0.82-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-aniso8601-0.82-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-aniso8601-0.82-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-aniso8601-0.82-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #12 from Jan Sedlák --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-aniso8601 Short Description: Python library for converting date in ISO8601 format into datetime object Owners: jsedlak Branches: f19 f20 e

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #11 from Jan Sedlák --- I have misstyped "epel7" to "el7", pasting new request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Jan Sedlák changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jan Sed

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flags|fedora-review?

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Ralph

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rb...@redhat.com -- You are receiving t

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-04-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rb...@redhat.com Flags|

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #6 from Jan Sedlák --- Ok, thanks, I have updated specfile and srpm to delete egg-info in %prep phase. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this prod

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to Jan Sedlák from comment #4) > I have excluded egg-info from packaging, but I thought that according to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs I should package > egg-info as

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #4 from Jan Sedlák --- I have excluded egg-info from packaging, but I thought that according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs I should package egg-info as well.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #3 from Jan Sedlák --- I have corrected specfile. Specfile with srpm are available on the same link here: Spec URL: http://jsedlak.fedorapeople.org/python-aniso8601.spec SRPM URL: http://jsedlak.fedorapeople.org/python-aniso8601-0.

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-02-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng --- 1. %if ! (0%{?fedora} > 12 || 0%{?rhel} > 5) %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib())")} %endif Will

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-02-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Jan Sedlák changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1061732 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzi

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 Jan Sedlák changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs

[Bug 1059659] Review Request: python-aniso8601 - library for parsing dates in ISO8601 format

2014-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059659 --- Comment #1 from Jan Sedlák --- Here is output from fedora-review package: http://jsedlak.fedorapeople.org/review-python-aniso8601/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about