https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|177841 (FE-N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
--- Comment #15 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
pbrobinson's scratch build of
linux-user-chroot?#b7afe5173cbd31b029b027b6f8a14baa5e6ce87a for
epel7-archbootstrap and
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/linux-user-chroot?#b7afe5173cbd31b029b027b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
--- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt ---
Running "fedora-review -b 1060386" fails. Please keep the "Spec URL:" and "SRPM
URL:" lines up-to-date.
[...]
Which rpmlint warnings/error do you find frustrating?
Try "rpmlint -i …" on the built rp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng ---
For issue 8, an extra question:
Release: 140223.sp3%{?dist}
Fedora packages seldom have release number up to 10^5, you'd better start from
1, but rebuild may destroy what you expect and may cause upg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng ---
OK.
Second stage(dont be panic, a lot still):
0. Why don't you use tarball at here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pandora/files/Pandora%20FMS%205.0/FinalSP3/Tarball/pandorafms_agent_unix-5.0SP3.t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
--- Comment #10 from Sancho Lerena ---
Hello again,
I tried to focus on rewrite the SPEC based on some suggestion and example
(nagios) spec. Thanks for the help.
The updated spec is at the same URL (overwriting the old one):
http://code.pan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
--- Comment #9 from Sancho Lerena ---
Wow. Thanks for the information, I will have a busy weekend working on all of
these :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt ---
> Prefix: /usr/share
Defining %{prefix} via a Prefix tag would mark the package as being
relocatable. That's important to know, and the following applies:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060386
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|p
10 matches
Mail list logo
