https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
flcluster-1.0.3-1.el7, flnet-7.3.2-1.el7, flwkey-1.2.3-2.el7,
linsim-2.0.3-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
flcluster-1.0.3-1.fc26, flnet-7.3.2-1.fc26, flwkey-1.2.3-2.fc26,
linsim-2.0.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
flcluster-1.0.3-1.fc26, flnet-7.3.2-1.fc26, flwkey-1.2.3-2.fc26,
linsim-2.0.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
flcluster-1.0.3-1.el7, flnet-7.3.2-1.el7, flwkey-1.2.3-2.el7,
linsim-2.0.3-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #24 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flnet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #23 from Richard Shaw ---
Thanks for the review! Repository has been requested.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #21 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #20)
> (In reply to mgans...@alice.de from comment #19)
> > Issues:
> > ===
> >
> > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #20 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to mgans...@alice.de from comment #19)
> Issues:
> ===
>
> [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> Note: Directories without known owners:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #19 from mgans...@alice.de ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- All build dependencies are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #18 from Richard Shaw ---
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet.spec
SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet-7.3.2-1.fc26.src.rpm
* Wed Nov 01 2017 Richard Shaw -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #17 from Richard Shaw ---
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet.spec
SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet-7.3.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
* Fri Oct 28 2016 Richard Shaw -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw ---
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet.spec
SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet-7.2.6-1.fc24.src.rpm
* Tue Oct 25 2016 Richard Shaw -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #15 from Richard Shaw ---
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet.spec
SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet-7.2.5-1.fc23.src.rpm
* Wed Dec 2 2015 Richard Shaw -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #14 from Richard Shaw ---
Alec, do you have time to finish this review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Do you still see the licensing as a blocker?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #12 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet.spec
SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet-7.2.3-1.fc21.src.rpm
* Tue May 5 2015 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com - 7.2.3-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #11 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #6)
Nor am I, and I might have given wrong (well, incomplete ;) ) info on this
earlier. If you choose to promote, you also need to patch the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #10 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Ok, not a guidelines violation:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-May/199059.html
I think that was the only blocker...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #8 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Ping?!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #9 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
I need to check if this one is affected but several of his projects bundle the
library xmlrpcpp...
Well, kind of... Upstream is pretty much dead and he has altered it quite a bit
to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #3 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
- License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #4 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 859312
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=859312action=edit
Patch to fix the bad FSF addresses (to be sent upstream).
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Yeah, I'm still not really good with licenses... Assuming we uprev the lower
GPL files, should we sayGPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #6 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Nor am I, and I might have given wrong (well, incomplete ;) ) info on this
earlier. If you choose to promote, you also need to patch the sources [1].
Although not that complicated in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #7 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
Whoops, no MIT in this one, I was in the wrong directory (fllog instead of
flnet, that's a separate review!).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6487097
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
32 matches
Mail list logo