https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|socket
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_QA
--- Comment #24 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
socket_wrapper-1.1.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/socket_wrapper-1.1.0-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Andreas Schneider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
socket_wrapper-1.0.1-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/socket_wrapper-1.0.1-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Andreas Schneider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Jakub Hrozek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #15 from Ja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Schneider ---
Ping Jakub :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Hrozek ---
Koji build succeeded:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6527004
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schneider ---
Spec URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/socket_wrapper/socket_wrapper.spec
SRPM URL:
http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/socket_wrapper/socket_wrapper-1.0.1-3.fc20.src.rpm
- Remove Group
- Remove glibc-dev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schneider ---
Spec URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/socket_wrapper/socket_wrapper.spec
SRPM URL:
http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/socket_wrapper/socket_wrapper-1.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
ChangeLog of 1.0.1:
* Added --l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schneider ---
Spec URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/socket_wrapper/socket_wrapper.spec
SRPM URL:
http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/socket_wrapper/socket_wrapper-1.0.1-2.fc20.src.rpm
* Fixed Unix typo.
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Hrozek ---
Hm, the last comment is a fair point. This library has no meaning on a box that
is not a devel machine (or a builder, or a test box)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schneider ---
I know, but I don't really want to do that. It would be the same as putting it
to /usr/lib64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schneider ---
Only developers will install these libs and they will only be in BuildRequires
and never in Requires :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Hrozek ---
(In reply to Andreas Schneider from comment #5)
> Stephen, but then you cannot do LD_PRELOAD=libsocket_wrapper.so cause the
> dynamic linker will not find it.
You could drop a file to /etc/ld.so.conf.d/
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schneider ---
Stephen, but then you cannot do LD_PRELOAD=libsocket_wrapper.so cause the
dynamic linker will not find it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Hrozek ---
(In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakub Hrozek from comment #2)
>
> > Issues:
> > ===
> > - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> > Note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Gallagher ---
(In reply to Jakub Hrozek from comment #2)
> Issues:
> ===
> - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
> See: h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Hrozek ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpacka
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Hrozek ---
Koji build went fine:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6488651
The package looks good and works as advertised.
Here is a full rpmlint output:
libsocket_wrapper.x86_64: W: spelling-error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060909
Jakub Hrozek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jhro...@redhat.com
Flags|
29 matches
Mail list logo
