[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-06-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #17 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com --- Thank you Adrien. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Package does not appear to exist in pkgdb currently, if this is a new package use a New Package Request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- httpress-1.1.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/httpress-1.1.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #15 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com --- I see. libev dropped pkg-config support for some reason. I've now hard coded the -I path in the spec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #16 from Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com --- Legend: X - valid ! - Invalid N∕A - not concerned [X]: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #14 from Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com --- Hi Nikos, The problem concerning the compilation on rawhide still exist : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6648099 The pkgconfig file seems to not exist anymore

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ade...@gmail.com

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #10 from Adrien Devresse ade...@gmail.com --- Hi Nikos, Alexandre is doing this review as part of his process to become packager. I'm his sponsor, I know take the responsability of this review. First thing, it seems to be

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #11 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Adrien Devresse from comment #10) Hi Nikos, Alexandre is doing this review as part of his process to become packager. I'm his sponsor, I know take the

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #3 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com --- Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/httpress-1.1.0-2.hgd8c968cead5a.fc20.src.rpm Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/httpress.spec --

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Beche alexandre.be...@gmail.com --- It seems the package does not compile for EPEL5/6 so lets focus on ferora release. Before going through the main review, can I ask you the following small fixes: - Put the

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #5 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com --- Hello, On the LICENSE, I think that I should wait for upstream to add a license file instead rather than putting a license for him (he's been contacted, and such a file will

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #6 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com --- SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/httpress-1.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/httpress.spec -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Beche alexandre.be...@gmail.com --- Hello, Please find below my informal review (note that it is my first one :) so I may have been too strict or permissive on some points). I think it will answers your two

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #8 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com --- Thanks. [__] - rpmlint on source and binary rpm (report enclosed below) rpmlint httpress-1.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm httpress.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US weighttp -

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #9 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com --- (btw. you may want to set the fedora-review flag to '?' so that the package is marked as under review) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 Alexandre Beche alexandre.be...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1062282] Review Request: httpress - HTTP stress benchmark utility

2014-02-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 --- Comment #2 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com --- Thanks. I wasn't really planning for that, but if there are no issues compiling there it could be an option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list