https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django15-1.5.5-7.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django15-1.5.5-7.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #12 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Lars Kellogg-Stedman from comment #11)
This latest spec file seems to resolve all the directory ownership issues,
but you still need to fix the quoting on your find
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #11 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com ---
This latest spec file seems to resolve all the directory ownership issues, but
you still need to fix the quoting on your find statements (bottom of comment
#8). With that in place
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Lars, thank you for your proposal.
Sadly, this doesn't seem to work (excluding, including later): this leeds to
many messages like:
warning: File listed twice:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #9 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com ---
Matthias,
I've put a modified spec file here:
- https://gist.github.com/larsks/9430481
This dramatically reduces the complexity of the %files sections by
moving all the locale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Updated
SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-django15.spec
SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-django15-1.5.5-5.fc20.src.rpm
- fixed docs build on rawhide (due
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #8 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com ---
Matthias,
You're going to hate me, but this package still results in a bunch of unowned
directory errors:
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
- bundled eggs are used for tests, but not distributed in rpm.
- Docs require base package to be installed (though forcing License to be
installed)
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #4 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com ---
Matthias,
Thanks for the updated packages; I'm checking them out right now. I
still have a question about how these packages are supposed to work
with existing Django applications:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #5 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com ---
Running fedora-review on the new package results in pages of:
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Ah yes, you're right. I need to remove Django from provides.
For darkserver to use this package, we'd need to change darkserver a bit to
be able to pick up this parallel installable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Lars, thank you for your review!it's really appreciated and this one is a tough
one!
First of all, I'm very sorry,I should have provided a matching spec file to the
srpm!
Addressing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@redhat.com
20 matches
Mail list logo
