https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
NOTE: Misformatted request; using 'Branches' instead.
WARNING: No new branches requested.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gnome-code-assistance-0.3.1-5.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-code-assistance-0.3.1-5.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #13 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il ---
Updated.
Spec URL:
http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gnome-code-assistance/gnome-code-assistance.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #14 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
Cool, great work!
While you are at this, is
/usr/libexec/gnome-code-assistance/backends/py/gnome/codeassistance/json/deps/simplejson/
also something that could be used from distro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #15 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il ---
Indeed, good catch.
Spec URL:
http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gnome-code-assistance/gnome-code-assistance.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #10 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
Looks nice, but I think the licensing stuff needs a bit more work. The license
tag now reads GPLv3+, MIT but it's still a bit unclear. There are more
licenses used -- in particular
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #11 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il ---
The go files are irrelevant because I'm not builidng the go backend atm
Also, what we are seeing here is worse, actually. That's bundling of system
libs and that's not good. I need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Jesse van den Kieboom jesse...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) i...@gnome.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #9 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il ---
Updated.
Spec URL:
http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gnome-code-assistance/gnome-code-assistance.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
A hard packaging question is how to deal with multiple backends. People who are
working on C code might not appreciate getting a ruby interpreter, for example.
The way the packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #6 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il ---
We could split each backend to a subpackage, but it will keep growing and
growing. Also, the ruby interpreter is needed for the CSS and HTML plugins, and
many people work on these too.
We
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
License:GPLv2+
I think this should be GPLv3+ instead. Some code files are GPLv2+, some are
GPLv3+, and some are MIT.
Also, something for upstream: a bunch of code files are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #4 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il ---
Updated.
Spec URL:
http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gnome-code-assistance/gnome-code-assistance.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
gnome-code-assistance 0.3.1 is out now; can you update the packaging please?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072054
--- Comment #1 from paolo borelli pbore...@katamail.com ---
(In reply to Elad Alfassa from comment #0)
upstream said they might do a release soon just for us.
Release is now done
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
26 matches
Mail list logo
