https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #34 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
Not sure how long to wait for Karel as the original requester. I could take
this package and open a new bug for the request.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bjoern.es...@gmail.com |i...@cicku.me
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||KDE Software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #32 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
HTML formatting seems to fail with Qt5, see upstream bug 345739.
Release #2 with enabled Qt5.
SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/trojita/trojita.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kvo...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #30 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
Fixed help2man. New rawhide scratch:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9102581
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #29 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/trojita/trojita.spec
SRPM:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/trojita/trojita-0.5-1.fc21.src.rpm
rawhide scratch:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #28 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
As I already said in comment #15 and explained in comment #17, I also agree
that you MUST require hicolor-icon-theme instead of owning the same
directories.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #27 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Please don't be so stubborn.
There is general agreement about explicitly requiring hicolor-icon-theme
package instead of _trying_ to own all used
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #26 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #25)
Remove these lines and put Requires: hicolor-icon-theme. The guideline
says to not own folders from a filesystem package, hicolor-icon-theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #25 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
(In reply to Karel Volný from comment #24)
…
btw, has anyone taken the hicolor-icon-theme issue anywhere, have I missed
something?
From your spec file:
%dir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #22 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #21)
%doc LICENSE README
Please move the license text to %license:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #18 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #17)
The icon-theme.cache file is actually ghosted, which means it is NOT part of
the installed size of the hicolor-icon-theme package.
okay,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #16 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #15)
The hicolor-icon-theme package is a *filesystem-type package.
the catch is that it is *filesystem-type but not *-filesystem
it carries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
The icon-theme.cache file is actually ghosted, which means it is NOT part of
the installed size of the hicolor-icon-theme package. The file is NOT created
by installing the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(i...@cicku.me)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
I still disagree about your handling of the hicolor icon theme.
The hicolor-icon-theme package is a *filesystem-type package. Therefore, this
section of the guidelines applies:
An
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
We indeed do not care about cross builds for Fedora packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #11 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
thanks Jan for the update
sorry, I'm overloaded now, there was vacation on May 1st and there will be on
May 8th, things should settle after the next RHSCL release, dont't expect me to
get
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Jan Kundrát j...@flaska.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@flaska.net
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #8 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/trojita.spec
SRPM URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/trojita-0.4.1-2.fc20.src.rpm
Koji scratch builds:
F20:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #4 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #2)
Offhand looks like a good start, some initial suggestions (SHOULD are just
recommendations and/or a matter of taste, MUST are required):
thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #5 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 886100
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=886100action=edit
trojita-0.4.1-2
$ diff trojita.spec~ trojita.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Please attach the fixed version, I will review it later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Offhand looks like a good start, some initial suggestions (SHOULD are just
recommendations and/or a matter of taste, MUST are required):
1. SHOULD add
Requires: hicolor-icon-theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #2)
Oh, just noticed the bug is assigned, but no review flag set, Christopher,
was that just an oversight?
Sorry, it's not an omission. I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #1 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
note that I've filed some bugs upstream for the things I've workarounded in
spec:
Bug 332578 - superfluous x-test language
[https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332578]
Bug 332579 -
38 matches
Mail list logo