https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR),|
|505154 (FE-SCITECH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #38 from Han Frederic ---
Thank you! If it helps here is a current update.
http://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~frederic.han/fedora/SPECS/giac.spec
http://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~frederic.han/fedora/SRPMS/giac-1.2.2-1.fc22.src.rpm
The tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #37 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Han Frederic from comment #36)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #35)
> > You need a sponsor; do you still want become an official packager? If yes,
> > please update your package,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #36 from Han Frederic ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #35)
> You need a sponsor; do you still want become an official packager? If yes,
> please update your package, i can review again, but i can't sponsor you yet.
Th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #35 from Antonio Trande ---
You need a sponsor; do you still want become an official packager? If yes,
please update your package, i can review again, but i can't sponsor you yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Han Frederic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(han@math.jussieu. |
|fr)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #32 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jgrulich's scratch build of kdevelop?#c8e2b9bc57f11e41f3dc6612cdbcc591078d9062
for f22-candidate and
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/kdevelop?#c8e2b9bc57f11e41f3dc6612cdbcc591078d9062
complete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #31 from Han Frederic ---
Update to the latest 1.1.1 version of the upstream source.
This upstream 1.1.1 file should not change anymore, next modifications will be
in 1.1.2.
(cf: http://xcas.e.ujf-grenoble.fr/XCAS/viewtopic.php?f=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Han Frederic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1104802 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #30 from Han Frederic ---
Thank you,
so I have remove these lines.
http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/1083941/comment30/giac.spec
The 1.1.1 tests have been updated with the legal pari syntax so the pari crash
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #29 from Christopher Meng ---
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/mimetypes
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #28 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #27 from Han Frederic ---
I have updated to giac 1.1.1 version (current stable) and cleanup the giac.spec
accordingly.
Also add a new dependency because of some new features in 1.1.1
http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/1083941
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||505154 (FE-SCITECH)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #26 from Han Frederic ---
Thank you for this crash report. I can manage to avoid it by swiching to the
legal pari syntax with:
sed -i
's/pari_ellpow(\[0,1,0,2,-15\]/pari_ellpow(pari_ellinit(\[0,1,0,2,-15\])/g'
check/TP08*.cas
bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||loganje...@gmail.com
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #24 from Han Frederic ---
Add a scratch build link of the latest version:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6820481
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #23 from Han Frederic ---
Thank you for your comments, and sorry for the delay I was off line last week.
. So I have allowed the doc package to be installable independently. To obtain
this I took M. Schwendt idea of a filesystem p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt ---
> %package doc
> Summary: Detailled html documentation for Giac/Xcas
Detailed
HTML
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> BuildArch: noarch
If it is "noarch", the dependency cannot be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #21 from Han Frederic ---
Ok, so
1) I have used the -f for the file list.
2) for /usr/share/mime and /usr/share/mime/packages without owner:
I have tried to install the file from the Makefile and the result was the
same. So I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #20 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Han Frederic from comment #19)
> > Also, under '%files' section
> >
> > %dir %{_datadir}/giac
> > %dir %{_datadir}/giac/doc
> > %dir %{_datadir}/giac/doc/de
> > %dir %{_datadir}/giac/doc/el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #19 from Han Frederic ---
Thanks for your answer on mime, I will try to avoid the *manually*.
> Also, under '%files' section
>
> %dir %{_datadir}/giac
> %dir %{_datadir}/giac/doc
> %dir %{_datadir}/giac/doc/de
> %dir %{_datadir}/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #18 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Han Frederic from comment #17)
>
> > /usr/share/icons is not in the review log (comment#14) and should not be
> > owned by your package.
> Yes it was an example for my question
> > Not eve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #17 from Han Frederic ---
> %{_datadir}/applications and %{_datadir}/pixmaps are owned by a main system
> package (filesystem). Your package doesn't need to own them.
>
> Verify with command:
>
> yum provides /usr/share/pixmaps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #16 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Han Frederic from comment #15)
> For 2. I have added those %dir but I wonder why not those 2:
> (I have tried with and without them and I didn't see complains in both cases.
> (neither syste
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #15 from Han Frederic ---
OK,
I have changed the spec only and regenerate the srpm:
http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/1083941/comment15/giac.spec
http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/1083941/comment15/giac-1.1.0-1.fc20.src.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #13 from Han Frederic ---
:D
Dear antonio,
I have updated the spec and SRPM.
Spec URL: http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/SPECS/giac.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/SRPMS/giac-1.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
rpmlint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #12 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #10)
> >As a consequence all the GPLv2+ files in the doc were raised in 1.1.1 to
> >>GPLv3+. So do you think we can release the non fr DOC under GPLV3+ with the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #11 from Han Frederic ---
(In reply to Han Frederic from comment #7)
> Dear antonio,
> . I have managed to adapt the 1.1.1 make check running from the spec.
>
> But before submitting a new spec I have some questions.
>
> . I foun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #10 from Antonio Trande ---
>As a consequence all the GPLv2+ files in the doc were raised in 1.1.1 to
>>GPLv3+. So do you think we can release the non fr DOC under GPLV3+ with the
>>1.1.0 package?
Okay so; leave a comment to you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #9 from Han Frederic ---
Yes, see Parisse's answer to my post:
http://xcas.e.ujf-grenoble.fr/XCAS/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1458
The problem is that 1.1.1 is frequently moving, that's why I had considered the
1.1.0 packaging.
since 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Han Frederic from comment #7)
> As a consequence all the GPLv2+ files in the doc were raised in 1.1.1 to
> GPLv3+. So do you think we can release the non fr DOC under GPLV3+ with the
> 1.1.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #7 from Han Frederic ---
Dear antonio,
. I have managed to adapt the 1.1.1 make check running from the spec.
But before submitting a new spec I have some questions.
. I found GPLv3 and GPLv2 files in the original 1.1.0 source arc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Han Frederic from comment #4)
1. ---
> For 4. I put comments in giac.spec. (did you want them in the description
> field?)
N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande ---
Created attachment 883764
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=883764&action=edit
giac.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #4 from Han Frederic ---
Thanks again for your help,
I have put updated versions here:
Spec URL: http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/SPECS/giac.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/SRPMS/giac-1.1.0-1.src.rpm
Fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
Okay, we can go on.
1. 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT'
'%clean' section
all file permission settings (%defattr..)
are not necessary anymore.
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #2 from Han Frederic ---
Dear Trande,
thanks a lot for your helpfull comments. So I have done a new spec.
Spec URL: http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/SPECS/giac.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~han/fedora/SRPMS/giac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
S
42 matches
Mail list logo
