https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Scott K Logan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(log...@cottsay.ne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
--- Comment #14 from Scott K Logan ---
Hey, Ben -
I did some work on this Sunday, and it looks like the Potassco codebase is in
significantly better shape than it was when I started these reviews. Instead of
the currently proposed model, I'd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rosser@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Scott K Logan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(log...@cottsay.ne |
|t)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||log...@cottsay.net
Flags|need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosser@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Scott K Logan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|i...@cicku.me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
--- Comment #8 from Scott K Logan ---
James - Christopher has been MIA on this review for a very long time now,
despite being pinged about it. If you are able, please take the review so we
can proceed.
--scott
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james.hoga...@gmail.com
Fl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richmat...@gmail.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
--- Comment #6 from Scott K Logan ---
There is interest in a downstream package, aspcud, being added in the near
future.
Christopher, is there any chance you can take another look at this anytime
soon?
Thanks,
--scott
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
--- Comment #5 from Scott K Logan ---
Upstream just released new versions of this chain that are sync'd properly. All
packages are now building at their latest versions without any bundled
software.
Spec URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
--- Comment #4 from Scott K Logan ---
Christopher -
Thanks for the feedback.
(1) and (2) have been fixed as described.
For (3), I assume you were looking for the -devel package to depend on the
base. I added that.
For (0), I'm sorry to rep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
SPEC:
0. 3.0.6 is available. Notified yet upstream about the wrong license header? I
don't think you need to modify them, just let upstream know and fix that.
1. cd build/custom_mt && make %{?_smp_mfl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
--- Comment #2 from Scott K Logan ---
Hi Christopher -
1. I have tried it, and no, it doesn't build any non-static libraries. From
what I can tell, the project only supports static libraries on non-Windows
systems.
2. I noted this in my init
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Scott K Logan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1093521
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
Scott K Logan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1093516
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
21 matches
Mail list logo
