https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
fcl-0.5.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
fcl-0.5.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
fcl-0.5.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
fcl-0.5.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #10 from Rich Mattes ---
Thanks for the review Antonio!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/fcl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #7 from Rich Mattes ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6)
>
> - LICENSE file is not packed
> Please, include the changelog file, too.
Good catch, I have included the changelog and license.
> -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
=== Issues ===
- LICENSE file is not packed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #5 from Rich Mattes ---
Thanks for the pointers Till. I've updated to 0.5.0, pulled the license
information patch you referred to from upstream, and added the permission
updates to the spec.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #4 from Till Hofmann ---
I was going to submit a review request for fcl and then found out that you're
working on it already :)
There is a 0.5 release with the merged soname fix. There is a commit in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #3 from Rich Mattes ---
1.
https://github.com/flexible-collision-library/fcl/issues/86
2.
https://github.com/flexible-collision-library/fcl/pull/90
I've fixed 3 and 4 in my local spec file. I'll submit an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1225692
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555
--- Comment #1 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com ---
Update:
Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/fcl/fcl.spec
SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/fcl/fcl-0.3.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
rpmlint:
$ rpmlint ./fcl.spec
18 matches
Mail list logo