https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105730
--- Comment #5 from Dave Love d.l...@liv.ac.uk ---
I (my users) don't need the tools as far as I know. I assumed the whole thing
should be built, but I don't know how that fits with any policy or anyone
else's
possible needs. I only did
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105730
Dave Love d.l...@liv.ac.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.l...@liv.ac.uk
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105730
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #3)
Calling it seqan would presumably cause trouble if anyone wants the tools
rather
than just the headers. The packaging I unfortunately did
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105730
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||505154 (FE-SCITECH),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105730
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Ths package should be named as seqan although it's a header-only package.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Header_Only_Libraries
--
You are receiving this
