https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System ---
llvm33-3.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #38 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
I wouldn't worry too much about keeping them in sync: given the current
upstream plans, F24 will be released with the next version of Julia, which will
probably rely on LLVM 3.8. So llvm33 would onl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #37 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #36)
> For -O3, I agree to drop it, but since it has worked for so long it doesn't
> sound like
> a serious issue. I'll fix that in the .spec file, but not w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #36 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Ah, good catch, owning an empty dir doesn't make much sense. For -O3, I agree
to drop it, but since it has worked for so long it doesn't sound like a serious
issue. I'll fix that in the .spec file,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #35 from Jens Petersen ---
BTW minor thing - still not sure if llvm33 needs to own
'%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}'? Keeping it in llvm33-devel looks okay to me.
And I noticed that I dropped -O3 from llvm34 - maybe you want to too?
I wi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #34 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
llvm33-3.3-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-c39b0b2f3b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #32 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #31 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Jens, would you finish your review? We should try to get both llvm3.3 and
llvm3.5 in.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #28)
> some way to add a prefix.
Sorry suffix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #27)
> Ah, I didn't know that. I can review it if you want. Sounds like a logical
> exchange.
Okay if you have time that would be appreciated.
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen ---
Thanks for all your work on this.
I am not sure which binary package should really correctly own the datadir
but overall the package looks fine to me now.
The only outstanding/embarrassing remaining iss
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #27 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Ah, I didn't know that. I can review it if you want. Sounds like a logical
exchange.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen ---
I note in passing that my llvm35 review is still open too (bug 1223673).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen ---
Thanks - will try to find time tomorrow to look at this again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #24 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Bump! :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #23 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Sorry for the delay. I've synchronized llvm33.spec with your changes to
llvm34.spec, and rebased the changelog and a few details on llvm.spec version
3.3. This one should be good to go -- and will a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: llvm33-doc : /usr/share/d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen ---
One thing, it also be good to compare with the old llvm.spec for 3.3
and also rebase the changelog off that.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/llvm.git/tree/llvm.spec?h=f19
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen ---
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/llvm34.git/commit/?id=3c25e4ba6538f2f804a5b1f0ed67ea39e95f8c68
(I think it is good to try to keep the spec files for
llvm33 <-> llvm34 <-> llvm35 <-> llvm36 in sync.)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #18)
> OK, I've started from your llvm34 package, and with very few changes it
> works.
Thanks
> %changelog
> +* Sat Jul 04 2015 Milan Bouchet-Valat 3.3-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1231163
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: llvm3.3 - |Review Request: llvm33 -
26 matches
Mail list logo
