https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn208 |codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn208
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn208 |codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn208
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn208 |codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn208
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn2080.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn2080.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn2080.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn2080.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn2080.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn2080.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn2080.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/codec2-0.3-5.20150317svn2080.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Richa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Jon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #9 from Richard Shaw ---
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/codec2.spec
SRPM:
https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/codec2-0.3-4.20141108svn1914.fc21.src.rpm
Ok, this should address everything! I'll query upstream about the l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
codec2.spec:91: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #7 from Richard Shaw ---
Updated spec and srpm since the current ones are so old.
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/codec2.spec
SRPM:
https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/codec2-0.3-3.20141108svn1914.fc21.src.rpm
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|val...@civ.zcu.cz |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #6 from František Dvořák ---
> >
> > OK. Maybe there can be needed the original author to confirm? But it is only
> > a small script anyway contribued to LGPL project...
>
> I can change the license of the subpackage, might be th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #3)
> >
> > > Maybe it is not needed to instal it, or alternativelly you can use GPLv2
> > > license for the -exampl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #4 from František Dvořák ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #3)
>
> > Maybe it is not needed to instal it, or alternativelly you can use GPLv2
> > license for the -example subpackage? In eihter way, you can ask upstream
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Richard S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz
Assignee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7051311
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
26 matches
Mail list logo
