https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-elasticsearch-transport-1.0.7-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #21 from Steve Traylen ---
EPEL 7 build blocked on lack of faraday
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206119
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #20 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-elasticsearch-transport-1.0.7-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport-1.0.7-1.el7
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-elasticsearch-transport-1.0.7-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport-1.0.7-1.fc21
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-elasticsearch-transport-1.0.7-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport-1.0.7-1.fc22
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from Stev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #13 from Steve Traylen ---
Apologies - URLs now have something on the end of them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #12 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
The Spec URL is not updated and the SRPM URL does not work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #11 from Steve Traylen ---
I'm skipping .el6, the ruby version itself is to old, I had removed it from
the other conditional but have removed from this one also.
Spec URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-elasticsearch-transp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #10 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
Just one more thing: as I see from this
> %if 0%{?fc19} || 0%{?fc20} || 0%{?el6} || 0%{?el7}
you're going for EPEL6 too. In that case, you need to add conditionalized:
Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8
This i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #9 from Steve Traylen ---
Spec URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport.spec
SRPM URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport/rubygem-elasticsearch-tran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #8 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
(In reply to Steve Traylen from comment #7)
> (In reply to Eduardo Mayorga from comment #5)
>
> >
> > Issues:
> > ===
> > - It is not necessary to include %{gem_spec} both in the main package and i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen ---
(In reply to Eduardo Mayorga from comment #5)
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - It is not necessary to include %{gem_spec} both in the main package and in
> the doc subpackage, since the doc subpackage Requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #6 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
(In reply to Eduardo Mayorga from comment #5)
> - The timestamps of source tarball in the source rpm are not preserved. You
> need to download it using the -N argument for wget or -R for curl in your
> b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #5 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- It is not necessary to include %{gem_spec} both in the main package and in
the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|e...@mayorgalinux.com
Fl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen ---
Spec URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport.spec
SRPM URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport/rubygem-elasticsearch-tran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #3 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
Some notes:
- Unnecessary macro: since there is no %check section, enable_tests is not in
use in this package.
- Please consider moving these files into -doc
%{geminstdir}/Rakefile
%{geminstdir}/elasti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen ---
Sure, will fix name at next iteration.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
--- Comment #1 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
I'd recommend you to use your real name in %changelog. "Fedora Cloud User"
doesn't say much about who is packaging this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116028
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1116030
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
28 matches
Mail list logo
