https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #15 from Ken Dreyer ---
I failed to notice the Rails 4.1 dependency so I've un-pushed the update for
F19 and F20. I'm not *entirely* sure if Rails 4.1 is a hard dep or if 4.0 would
be ok and upstream could loosen their gemspec... a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch ---
I hope you enjoyed your vacation and thanks :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #12 from Ken Dreyer ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #8)
> Ken, can you proceed to get rid of one broken dependency in F21? Thanx.
I just returned from vacation so I've pushed this to updates-testing today.
That broken de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-joiner-0.3.3-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-joiner-0.3.3-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-joiner-0.3.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-joiner-0.3.3-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-joiner-0.3.3-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-joiner-0.3.3-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Ken Drey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #5 from Ken Dreyer ---
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #3)
> Yes, rubygem-activerecord were installed (with the rubygem-rails).
>
> The command:
> ruby -e "require 'active_record'; require 'joiner'"
> works fine.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #3 from František Dvořák ---
(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #2)
>
> > 5) (question) there is not used "require 'active_record'" anywere in joiner
> > sources, but I guess it's OK (developers using joiner will require rails o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer ---
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #1)
> Issues or changes for consideration:
>
> 1) new version of joiner is available (0.3.3)
Thanks, I've updated the gem to 0.3.3.
* Fri Oct 10 2014 Ken Dreyer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
--- Comment #1 from František Dvořák ---
Issues or changes for consideration:
1) new version of joiner is available (0.3.3)
2) (cosmetic) you can consider using unified way of excluding files (replacing
"rm .%{gem_instdir}/%{gem_name}.gemspe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1090025
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
20 matches
Mail list logo
