https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psab...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
--- Comment #8 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #6)
Petr,
Do we still have any updated guidelines for having all the BuildRequires
specified in perl module specs? I see some of you are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
--- Comment #9 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
So according to the guidelines i should have approved the review, given that
the wording is recommended not mandatory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
--- Comment #1 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
License is correct.
Add the following BRs
BR perl(strict)
BR perl(warnings)
BR perl(utf8)
BR perl(B)
builds successfully in rawhide
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7194336
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
--- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk ---
Thank you for the review.
(In reply to David Dick from comment #1)
License is correct.
Add the following BRs
BR perl(strict)
BR perl(warnings)
BR perl(utf8)
BR perl(B)
Why would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
--- Comment #3 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
Because modules move in and out of the perl core at the discretion of the
porters. If we (fedora packagers) explicitly describe all the modules we rely
on, this prevents build failures later
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
--- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk ---
(In reply to David Dick from comment #3)
Because modules move in and out of the perl core at the discretion of the
porters. If we (fedora packagers) explicitly describe all the modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
15 matches
Mail list logo
