https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|yadifa-1.0.3-2.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|yadifa-1.0.3-2.el7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
yadifa-1.0.3-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yadifa-1.0.3-2.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #7 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Thanks for the corrections, Christopher.
Updated spec: http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora20/testing/yadifa.spec
Koji scratch builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
1. Compiler flags are still problematic, because the %optflags are inserted
before the flags defined by upstream.
Pick 1 line from the build.log:
libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #5 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
All done, the updated spec:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora20/testing/yadifa.spec
Koji scratch builds:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7427953 (Rawhide)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
I will post the -1 review results here, then run fedora-review on -2 you
provided in the mail. Forgot to mention, please incorporate your changes and
post everything on Bugzilla.
Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #1 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Note: rpmlint reports an error E: missing-call-to-setgroups /usr/sbin/yadifad
caused by missing `initgroups` or `setgroups` call in function in
`sbin/yadifad/main.c` file:
static void
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
25 matches
Mail list logo
