https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Yaniv Bronhaim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
--- Comment #19 from Yaniv Bronhaim ---
Thank you for the followup Michael. We will fix the warnings and post the
updated links in new bug. When that's done I will close that bug as the
reporter cannot continue the process
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
--- Comment #18 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
> Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org → ybron...@redhat.com
As pointed out in comment 16, the bugzilla review tickets are assigned to _the
reviewer_, which in this cas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Yaniv Bronhaim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ybron...@redhat.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|vdel...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Yaniv Bronhaim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ybron...@redhat.com |vdel...@redhat.com
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Dan Kenigsberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(vdel...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(vdel...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Dan Kenigsberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(bugs.michael@gmx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Yaniv Bronhaim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(vdel...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt ---
I've had trouble finding this ticket after the xmas break, since it's "under
review" already: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/
It's assigned to Yaniv Bronheim, comment 2:
> Fedora Accoun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
--- Comment #9 from Vitor de Lima ---
New revision addressing the previous comments:
Spec URL: http://vdelima.fedorapeople.org/safelease.spec
SRPM URL: http://vdelima.fedorapeople.org/safelease-1.0-3.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt ---
A few comments:
> %global libname safelease
>
> Name: %{libname}
What's the purpose of defining %libname when
1) the "Name" tag defines %name already,
2) you don't use %libname everywhere,
3)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Vitor de Lima changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vdel...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt ---
There are various packaging mistakes (do pay attention to what the
fedora-review and rpmlint tools find, for example), one which I had pointed out
to Yoav in private already:
The package is inacceptabl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
--- Comment #4 from Yaniv Bronhaim ---
remove python- suffix:
Spec URL: http://bronhaim.fedorapeople.org/safelease.spec
SRPM URL: http://bronhaim.fedorapeople.org/safelease-1.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
--- Comment #3 from Yaniv Bronhaim ---
Spec URL: http://bronhaim.fedorapeople.org/python-safelease.spec
SRPM URL: http://bronhaim.fedorapeople.org/python-safelease-1.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Yaniv Bronhaim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ybron...@redhat.com
Assignee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt ---
Consider perusing Fedora's Packaging Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
Watch out for sections that are relevant to what is found in your spec file.
Also consider runni
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
Yoav Kleinberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Reference
22 matches
Mail list logo
