[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||989565 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 Rajalakshmi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Rajala

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redh

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedorapr

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #16 from Rajalakshmi --- Updated. SPEC URL : https://github.com/paflib/paflib/blob/packaging/paflib.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/paflib/paflib/blob/packaging/paflib-0.1.3-4.fc19.src.rpm Koji build: http://ppc.koji.fedorapro

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt --- > Name: paflib > Group: Development/Libraries The group for _runtime_ library packages has been "System Environment/Libraries" for a very long time. Alternatively, consider dropping the Group tag: ht

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #14 from Rajalakshmi --- SPEC URL : https://github.com/paflib/paflib/blob/packaging/paflib.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/paflib/paflib/blob/packaging/paflib-0.1.3-3.fc19.src.rpm Koji build: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/k

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #13 from Rajalakshmi --- - does upstream provide any API or ABI stability for the library? do you mean if it supports ABI ELF v1 and v2? Yes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are a

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #12 from Rajalakshmi --- Updated. SPEC URL : https://github.com/paflib/paflib/blob/packaging/paflib.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/paflib/paflib/blob/packaging/paflib-0.1-3.fc19.src.rpm Koji build: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproje

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #11 from Dan Horák --- few more things: - %{_includedir}/paf directory is unowned, add "%dir %{_includedir}/paf" to %files for devel subpackage - why not make the version set to 0.1.3? you can the use "setup -q -n %{name}-0.1" - us

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #10 from Rajalakshmi --- Thanks Ralf for the comments.Updated. SPEC URL : https://github.com/paflib/paflib/blob/packaging/paflib.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/paflib/paflib/blob/packaging/paflib-0.1-2.fc19.src.rpm Koji build

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius --- * Please remove this line in %install: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT It is superflous. rpm automatically cleans RPM_BUILD_ROOT * Please remove "--prefix=%{_prefix} --libdir=%{_libdir}" from the call to %config

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #8 from Rajalakshmi --- Updated with review comments. - Removed builddir. - Updated changelog. (used same 0.1-1 as this has not yet been built as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs ) SPEC URL : https

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák --- Raji, please post new URLs for updated spec file and srpm. Also don't forget to increase Release in each iteration and update %changelog. The reasons for building outside of current dir are not relevant for b

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 --- Comment #6 from Rajalakshmi --- Thanks for the comments. I removed static libraries and %defattr() definitions. The reason to step to a different directory in configure and install is: The object directoy has to be different from sourc

[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: paflib -|Review Request: paflib -