https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
libu2f-host-1.0.0-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
libu2f-host-1.0.0-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #29 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jjelen's scratch build of
yubico-piv-tool?#f493f908260c8e3946798b6730c4e20e37b367fa for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
libu2f-host-1.0.0-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3edb5a0c25
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
libu2f-host-1.0.0-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-f51a4a41c2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #22 from Seth Jennings ---
Unversioned .so files belong in the -devel package per the guidelines (rpmlint
complains).
Yes, this libu2f-host review and the libu2f-server review (1259460) both need
some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #21 from Baptiste Mille-Mathias
---
Hi gents,
As it seems there is no review done yet on this package, perhaps you should ask
some on the developers mailing-list?
I've quickly look at the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
Seth Jennings changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DEFERRED|DUPLICATE
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
Seth Jennings changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #19 from Andy Lutomirski ---
Seth, if you want to own this, can you close this bug and open a new one? I
think that's required for the semi-automatic review magic.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
Seth Jennings changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #18 from Seth Jennings ---
Now that my first package, yubioath-desktop, is fully complete and know the
process and I'm coming back to this.
Based on Andy's previous submissions + changes to address Till's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #16 from spartacu...@gmail.com ---
Andy, are you still interested in maintaining this? If not, I can pick it up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #17 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu ---
Sure! Or we could co-maintain.
I want to remove the udev policy from here in favor of:
https://github.com/amluto/u2f-hidraw-policy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #15 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name ---
Sorry, I did not noctice your update until now.
There are still some issues:
- The license of the library is actually LGPLv2+ only the command line tools
are GPLv3+
- There is more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #14 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu ---
I updated to the new version, make those changes, and dropped the udev rule.
I'll make another new package with a udev rule, since I think it should be
separate.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #13 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name ---
some further remarks:
- COPYING should probably be marked as %license
- The manpage pattern should be: %{_mandir}/man1/u2f-host.1* - so it also works
when the man page is not compressed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opensou...@till.name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #10 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu ---
Spec URL: http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/libu2f_host_0.0-4/libu2f-host.spec
SRPM URL:
http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/libu2f_host_0.0-4/libu2f-host-0.0-4.fc20.src.rpm
Koji scratch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #11 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu ---
This is now getting ridiculous. When fixing the _udevrulesdir thing, I clearly
failed to redo the mock build, and I was missing BR: systemd. Sorry!
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
Finnbarr P. Murphy j321...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j321...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #8 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu ---
Adam, Patrick, are either of you planning on reviewing this? The bug is still
unassigned.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #4 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org ---
I think you want to use the _udevrulesdir macro.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #5 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu ---
Will do for -3. Want a new version now or later?
FWIW, I'm hoping to get rid of that udev rule entirely. I send a patch to
systemd to handle U2F devices for real instead of trying to list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #6 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org ---
No rush. Solving it in systemd is a nice solution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #7 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu ---
Spec URL: http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/libu2f_host_0.0-3/libu2f-host.spec
SRPM URL:
http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/libu2f_host_0.0-3/libu2f-host-0.0-3.fc20.src.rpm
The only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #2 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu ---
I'm going to have to send a new version with a trivial update: libu2f-host
needs a udev rule to work correctly as non-root, and I didn't include it in
this version. I post an update later
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #3 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu ---
Spec URL: http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/libu2f_host_0.0-2/libu2f-host.spec
SRPM URL:
http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/libu2f_host_0.0-2/libu2f-host-0.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
Description:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #1 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu ---
Created attachment 949602
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=949602action=edit
Self-review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
31 matches
Mail list logo