https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Linda Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1215874
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Linda Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1215872
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.fc20 |WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.el7
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.el7 |WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.el6
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.fc21 |WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.fc20
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Scott K Logan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Scot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Ric
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
--- Comment #9 from Scott K Logan ---
Okay, I believe that I have addressed all outstanding issues:
- python-devel dependency changed to python2-devel
- logrotate.d owned by WALinuxAgent
- rhel >= 7 uses systemd instead of sysV
Spec URL: htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
--- Comment #8 from Scott K Logan ---
Thanks, Rich.
I'll go ahead and make the package own logrotate.d. I had no idea that is how
you were supposed to handle that situation. Thanks for the link!
I'm not sure why I had BR: python-devel - I'll
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
--- Comment #7 from Rich Mattes ---
Yeah that original spec was a big crufty mess... The package is simple enough
that an all-new spec file is probably less work than sorting out the original.
It looks pretty good now.
As far as your notes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
--- Comment #6 from Scott K Logan ---
Okay, I'm starting to see that re-factoring the sample spec is not going to
work. At this rate, we will have modified the entire thing just to meet
packaging specifications.
I made a spec from scratch tha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Rich Matte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richmat...@gmail.com
Assignee|n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Scott K Logan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #3 from Scott K Logan -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #1 from
25 matches
Mail list logo
