[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #34 from Yamin --- Will we get it on Fedora 26? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #33 from haevalen...@gmail.com --- Fantastic, Budgie Desktop has improved a lot lately and it would be fantastic availability in fedora or as an additional spin. However, it has some flaws in usability as the inconsistency of some

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #32 from mikey --- My initial plan was to get this running in a reasonable packaged form on my Chromebook. But it would be nice to get it packaged up in a state that it could be included for the

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #28 from mikey --- I haven't tried to remove "libgnome-volume-control" from my updated spec file as I'm not sure how to go about it, but perhaps with some guidance we can get it packaged up in an

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #26 from mikey --- Created attachment 1121945 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1121945=edit Updated SPEC for budgie desktop 10.2.2 This is my attempt to update the original spec to

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #29 from Rex Dieter --- Re: .desktop validation in comment #26 ... You really only need to validate stuff under /usr/share/applications (ie, stuff intended to be displayed in application menus) -- You are

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #30 from Rex Dieter --- Oh, and for OnlyShowIn=... I'd recommend patching things to use/recognize X-Budgie instead for now, at least until Budgie is registered formally. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #27 from mikey --- Created attachment 1121946 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1121946=edit Updated patch for budgie desktop 10.2.2 Here is the updated patch to go along with the spec

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 mikey changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #24 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pbrobinson's scratch build of gnome-dvb-daemon?#451a118009234eac9e3f06f465b00cf93478a5d5 for

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #23 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- In light of the recent FESCo decision, the bundling would be allowed. Would be nice to make another attempt at this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 Neal Gompa ngomp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #21 from Manilal libreg...@gmail.com --- It would be really nice if we could include Budgie in Fedora 23. It's really a good desktop with sleek UI and high performance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #20 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name --- Will try and find the time to do this in the next couple of days - I don't have access to Fedora at work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #19 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Ping? Build for new rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=816. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #18 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- So, I think the FPC decision is suboptimal, but let's try to get this done. Can you check if you can build budgie with

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #16 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- (In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #15) Meanwhile, let's continue the review on the assumption that an exemption will be granted (the other packages that

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #17 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name --- https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/476#comment:6 The copylib exception is rejected, we'd have to turn libgnome-volume-control into a shared lib. I'll follow up on the

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name --- I just opened a request to determine whether libgnome-volume-control is an appropriate copylib with FPC: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/476 Meanwhile, let's continue

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #14 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Ah, FPC not FESCo. Sorry, there's a link to FESCo in the next paragraph which I copied by mistake. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- My last comment is wrong. Even if it is a copy library, FESCo is supposed to give its stamp of approval. Please file a ticket for a bundling exception at

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- desktop-file-install should be used. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage. .appdata.xml file should be added. See

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 lnxslck bquei...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|bquei...@gmail.com | --- Comment #8 from

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name --- Updated spec and SRPM: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/desktop/budgie-desktop.spec https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/desktop/budgie-desktop-8-2.fc21.src.rpm

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #7) budgie bundles https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgnome-volume-control. If I read things correctly, it does not use

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Ah, OK, that's why I couldn't find it. According to [1] the submodule does not have a stable api and is supposed to be linked wherever it is needed. So including it in

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 lnxslck bquei...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bquei...@gmail.com ---

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name --- (In reply to lnxslck from comment #1) I second that. Budgie is a clean and good looking DE, a good alternative for those who don't like Gnome or have a computer with less

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3) Some remarks: - The # Adjust for Fedora's multilib directory layout section from %build is a hack playing with the symtops

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3) Some remarks: snip +prefix=@prefix@ +exec_prefix=@prefix@ +libdir=@libdir@ +includedir=@includedir@

[Bug 1170875] Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- (In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #5) On that note, what's the difference between ${prefix} and %prefix% ? Thanks. Let me try to elaborate. When building, the *.spec