https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188372
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188372
--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Come to think more on it, since kate(5) no longer includes the kate-part
component, we won't have to worry about keeping this co-installable either
moving forward (in contrast to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188372
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Many KDE applications use that libkdeinit trick a lot to optimize startup and
shared memory. It's not a shared library in the conventional sense, so I
would argue does not need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188372
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188372
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Moreover, you should move COPYING.LIB to %license to make it cloud-safe from
the start on.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188372
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews),
