https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #30 from Alan Pevec ---
Ignore akanda-router-api example, it's using Flask.
Barbican already has paste ini file so it should as simple as:
gunicorn --paste /etc/barbican/barbican-api-paste.ini ...
http://docs.gunicorn.org/en/19.3/r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #29 from Alan Pevec ---
No movement on the upstream bug, I found gunicorn usage in
openstack/akanda-appliance:
* init script
https://github.com/openstack/akanda-appliance/blob/master/scripts/etc/init.d/akanda-router-api-server
* te
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #28 from Alan Pevec ---
LP 1504291 - Add support for Gunicorn (as reportedly used in production
deployments)
uwsgi is a huge with lots of plugins for different languages, pure-python
gunicorn is an easier to rebuild in CentOS Clou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||Launchpad 1504291
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #27 from Greg Swift ---
Apparently alee's fas user is vakwetu. I can just add him after
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla ---
alee not in packager group.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@redhat.com
--- Comment #25 from A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Greg Swift changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(gregswift@gmail.c |fedora-cvs?
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chku...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|needi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Greg Swift changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(gregswift@gmail.c |needinfo?(karlthered@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gregsw...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Greg Swift changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #18 from Haïkel Guémar ---
Few things:
* a typo
install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE1}
%{buildroot}%{_unitdir}/openstack-barbican-worker.service
should be =>
install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE2}
%{buildroot}%{_unitdir}/openstack-barbican-worke
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #16 from Kevin Fox ---
Got it to build. Trying to install but python-cryptography is needed by
python-barbican-2014.2-4.el7.centos.noarch but not in epel. I'll see if I can
dig up a copy somewhere.
Thanks,
Kevin
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #15 from Greg Swift ---
(In reply to Kevin Fox from comment #13)
> I've been using uwsgi and systemd on the rpm's I had to hand craft for our
> centos 7.1 system. It is working ok. I think its a good solution to make
> progress on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Greg Swift changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Fox ---
I've been using uwsgi and systemd on the rpm's I had to hand craft for our
centos 7.1 system. It is working ok. I think its a good solution to make
progress on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #12 from Michael McCune ---
update on the start/stop scripts.
at the last barbican upstream meeting user jkf shared with me a few systemd
unit files for barbican that are in use on centos systems. these look like they
could be ada
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #11 from Michael McCune ---
there has been some recent activity surrounding creating better scripts for
barbican. here is a bug[1] that has been logged to track the effort.
there are also plans to create a better wsgi container a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #10 from Greg Swift ---
hrm.. not sure why i didnt include those. dont see why we couldnt just use
them. i'm gonna be out for about a week then i'll get on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #9 from Haïkel Guémar ---
By curiosity, I gave a shot to the paste-based scripts provided upstream
(master) and they work perfectly fine, I was able to run service without
glitches.
https://github.com/openstack/barbican/tree/master
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #8 from Greg Swift ---
Ya, unfortunately that is a growth point issue for the project. barbican.sh is
very much a development bootstrap. It does side loading via pip, etc.
In talking to a few of the developers I originally got 'we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Greg Swift changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Greg Swift changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #3 from Haïkel Guémar ---
Sorry for the delay:
1. python-barbican contains no python modules, that's due to missing
BuildRequires. By adding oslo stuff, I was able to fix that issue.
https://github.com/openstack/barbican/blob/stabl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Ala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #1 from Greg Swift ---
Update:
To follow closer with the RDO openstack process I've rolled this back to juno
stable:
Spec URL: http://nytefyre.net/rpms/openstack-barbican.spec
SRPM URL: http://nytefyre.net/rpms/openstack-barbican
35 matches
Mail list logo
