https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
--- Comment #13 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #11)
> I don't understand. That's not a problem with autoconf, just a requirement
> of
> a package.
Sorry, I realize it was in reference to #1174292, but I can do libtool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski ---
We're going to need a libtool24 package then as well to make this useful. May
want to test this out in a copr before going too far down this road.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
--- Comment #11 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #10)
> Well, it was nice thought:
>
> autoreconf268: running: aclocal --force -I ../build-config/m4 -I
> ../vendor/common/build-config/m4
> ../build-includes/common.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
Dave Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Dave Love
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski ---
Well, it was nice thought:
autoreconf268: running: aclocal --force -I ../build-config/m4 -I
../vendor/common/build-config/m4
../build-includes/common.m4:100: error: Libtool version 2.4 or higher is
req
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
autoconf268-2.68-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/autoconf268-2.68-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
--- Comment #6 from Dave Love ---
Thanks. I'll make the check change and bump the release.
If there's good reason to update release numbers for spec changes in review,
perhaps it could be added to the guidelines so it's not just a matter of
j
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
--- Comment #4 from Dave Love ---
I made the changes, though I must say it seems at best a waste of effort.
I didn't change the version for cosmetic spec mods.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski ---
Because this is a Fedora EPEL package, and I want it to conform to the Fedora
EPEL guidelines and not have a bunch of old cruft in it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
--- Comment #2 from Dave Love ---
I can change it if really necessary, but it has minimal changes from the
RHEL source. Why is it worth the effort making it different (not a rhetorical
question)? It seems more maintainable if anything to ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375
Dave Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1174292
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
18 matches
Mail list logo
