https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|tonto-1.44-3.20150312gitbe1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tonto-1.44-3.20150312gitbe1657a.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tonto-1.44-3.20150312gitbe1657a.fc22
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tonto-1.44-3.20150312gitbe1657a.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tonto-1.44-3.20150312gitbe1657a.fc21
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #33 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Jakub: thanks for heads-up! Obviously, updates are under way (rawhide is
pushed).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Jakub Čajka jca...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jca...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #24 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for a really good review which actually made a difference (not all do).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #25 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: tonto
Short Description: Tools for Pronto programmable remote controls
Upstream URL: http://mrallen.com/tonto/
Owners:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tonto-1.44-2.20150312gitbe1657a.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tonto-1.44-2.20150312gitbe1657a.fc22
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
tonto-1.44-2.20150312gitbe1657a.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tonto-1.44-2.20150312gitbe1657a.fc21
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #21 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #20)
[!] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
JNI libraries should not be placed in libdir directly, not even
symlinks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #22 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Silly, silly (sloppy?) me. Fixed, new links:
spec: https://leamas.fedorapeople.org/harctoolbox/tonto.spec
srpm: https://leamas.fedorapeople.org/harctoolbox/tonto-1.44-7.fc21.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #20 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
[!] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
JNI libraries should not be placed in libdir directly, not even symlinks.
tonto should be patched to load JNI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|or...@cora.nwra.com |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #17 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Not ready? Why?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #8 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
First, the main license in tonto-1.44/doc/LICENSE.txt file is not the Artistic
license described on Fedora wiki - license texts differ. Fedora legal should
check if this license is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #10 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Michal Srb from comment #9)
(In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #8)
First, the main license in tonto-1.44/doc/LICENSE.txt file is not the
Artistic license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #11 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #10)
The text on Fedora wiki points to
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/language/misc/Artistic.html, which is not the same
text as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Sorry, I read the manpage wrong (how has this script ever worked?). Updated
in-place, same links, changelog update.
Did I say that the license was a good catch? And so was this...
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #14 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #13)
2. get-source1.sh should have mktemp -d instead of pure mktemp. mktemp
without -d creates regular file
Not needed, it's the default
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #4 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
Not really, the somewhat unexpected course of events on the meeting made me
just remove that code - it turned out be quite simple, actually.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #6 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com ---
As this was raised on the FPC: The latest version is 1.48, but those sources
are not available (a GPL violation). I'm trying to get in touch with the
author, partly about this issue
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
You need to block FE-LEGAL to get an opinion on the osbaldeston code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
--- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Ah, didn't catch that. Excellent.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
---
38 matches
Mail list logo
