[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #25 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- Actually, the way I added the conditionals is broken, so for now we'll go with this: SRPM: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra-0.14.21-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #24 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- SPEC: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra.spec SRPM: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra-0.14.21-2.fc20.src.rpm * Mon Mar 23 2015 Jonathan G. Underwood

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 Bug 1198312 depends on bug 1199189, which changed state. Bug 1199189 Summary: Review Request: js-web-socket-js - HTML5 Web Socket implementation powered by Flash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199189 What|Removed

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #26 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- Some remaining issues: - I missed one more bundled library in the first pass, my apologies. Fortunately it is already packaged, so this is an easy fix. This also depends

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #27 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- SPEC: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra.spec SRPM: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra-0.14.21-2.fc20.src.rpm * Mon Mar 23 2015 Jonathan G. Underwood

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #28 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- Will run fedora-review against these packages and report back. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- SPEC: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra.spec SRPM: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra-0.14.21-1.fc20.src.rpm * Wed Mar 18 2015 Jonathan G. Underwood

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- SPEC: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra.spec SRPM: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra-0.14.19-6.fc20.src.rpm * Wed Mar 18 2015 Jonathan G. Underwood

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- BZ #1199189 is a review request for the unbundled js-web-socket-js package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- Thanks for the input Antoine, much appreciated. (In reply to Antoine Martin from comment #19) [snip] Note: we're not going to unbundle jquery and websockets, because

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- Update again to work on F20. Minimally tested locally on F20 by starting session, running xterm, killing session. SPEC: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra.spec SRPM:

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- Updated packages which build fine - haven't had chance to test their usage yet though. SPEC: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra.spec SRPM:

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- For anyone wanting to test packages, I've created a COPR repository here: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jgu/xpra/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- SPEC: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra.spec SRPM: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xpra-0.14.19-4.fc20.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Mar 3 2015 Jonathan G. Underwood

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- Hmm... I am finding that when forwarding individual app windows (as opposed to the whole desktop) window resizing doesn't work properly. From Googling I can't work out if

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- (In reply to T.C. Hollingsworth from comment #15) (In reply to Jonathan Underwood from comment #14) Hmm... I am finding that when forwarding individual app windows (as

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #17 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Jonathan Underwood from comment #16) Interesting. Which Fedora versions are you running on the client and server? I only did F20-F20 as well using your

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #18 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = ISSUES = [!]: Package does not contain bundled

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #15 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Jonathan Underwood from comment #13) Just collecting a few things here for later: 1) Need to package js-jquery-ui and js-web-socket-js from upstream and

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- OK, thanks for the explanation - I'm all clear now. Just collecting a few things here for later: 1) Need to package js-jquery-ui and js-web-socket-js from upstream and

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #19 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk --- Upstream here. Sorry for replying late. First, I would like to say that many of us are happy Fedora users and would love to help in getting xpra in Fedora proper. So if you need us

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #12 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Jonathan Underwood from comment #7) (In reply to T.C. Hollingsworth from comment #2) * rencode : Y * server : Y * shadow

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jonathan.underwoo |

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- Hi, great thanks for reappearing on this, and the useful pre-review. There's a lot here to work on, not least of which is the need for a package of pyopencl. I'll start to

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #5 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- not least of which is the need for a package of pyopencl Make that two mistakes, I thought we had it. I wouldn't consider this a review blocking issue, then. Neither is

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- (In reply to T.C. Hollingsworth from comment #2) [snip] * dec_avcodec : N * dec_avcodec2 : Y This is a prohibited item and should be disabled. My

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- (In reply to T.C. Hollingsworth from comment #2) * rencode : Y * server : Y * shadow : Y * sound: Y *

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- OK, picking this up in an effort to move it forward. If the original package submitter returns and wants to pick it up again, fine by me, but in the meantime, if someone

[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - screen for X

2015-03-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 Bug 1198312 depends on bug 928609, which changed state. Bug 928609 Summary: Review Request: xpra - screen for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609 What|Removed |Added