https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the quick review, Erik!
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: mingw-libepoxy
Short Description: MinGW Windows libepoxy library
Upstream URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #2)
(In reply to Erik van Pienbroek from comment #1)
* Please use a versioned BR: mingw{32,64}-filesystem (for example = 95)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Erik van Pienbroek from comment #1)
Taking for review
* Is there a particular reason why you're running 'autoreconf'? There are no
patches bundled which require the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194
--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
I noticed myself that I'd put wrong license tag in the spec file. Here are
updated files:
* Tue Mar 24 2015 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com - 1.2-2
- Package review fixes
