https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter ---
naming: ok
licensing: ok
sources: ok
926bd7bea6bccd2c618d97d39cc7d4ad doublecmd-0.6.4-src.tar.gz
1. MUST use desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate for application
.desktop files, see
http://fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugzilla.redhat.com |
|/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BuildFails |
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #17 from Raphael Groner ---
Christopher, what are you talking about?
The difference between qt and gtk2 is handled with subpackages. I fail to see
any trouble with that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Meng ---
I'm also against that as default doublecmd is built with gtk2 widget.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng ---
I'm thinking about using alternative command to make 2 packages existing in one
system.
Thoughts?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1209477, which changed state.
Bug 1209477 Summary: lazarus-1.4.2-0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209477
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner ---
> [1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/vondruch/doublecmd/
I decided to not like building from subversion, at least not for an official
package and if there's no patch needed.
FTBFS is magically fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #11)
> Though, I don't see any reason why "beta" target is needed, do you mean to
> put in Release? Version 0.6.4 is official with no beta hint at all, the zero
> in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner ---
FTBFS for arch i686:
…
+ /usr/bin/lazbuild src/doublecmd.lpi --bm=beta --widgetset=gtk2 --cpu=i386
…
TProject.DoLoadStateFile Statefile not found:
/builddir/build/BUILD/doublecmd-0.6.4/units/i386-linux-g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #10)
> Last time I discussed the .zdli with upstream, they insisted that we should
> distribute also the .zdli, although we have possibly debuginfo available and
> t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch ---
Last time I discussed the .zdli with upstream, they insisted that we should
distribute also the .zdli, although we have possibly debuginfo available and
that we should use the "beta" target for build. I kno
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner ---
SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/doublecmd/doublecmd.spec
SRPM:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/doublecmd/doublecmd-0.6.4-1.fc22.src.rpm
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1209477
--- Comment #8 from Raphael
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner ---
Upstream announced version 0.6.2 beta. I'll try to update the package soon.
http://doublecmd.sourceforge.net/mantisbt/changelog_page.php?version_id=34
If there'll still be build issues as it turns out fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
It turns out that lazbuild needs a bugfix to get some doublecmd build success.
> Lazarus 1.4 has a bug in lazbuild utility. I wrote about it to Lazarus
> bugtracker and it was fixed (revisions 48892,4889
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1215643, which changed state.
Bug 1215643 Summary: ERROR: Broken dependency: KASComp 1.8>KASComp 1.8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215643
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1215643, which changed state.
Bug 1215643 Summary: ERROR: Broken dependency: KASComp 1.8>KASComp 1.8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215643
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||BuildFails
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: doublecmdt |Review Request: doublecmd -
22 matches
Mail list logo
