https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
Fedora End Of Life changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #16 from Fedora End Of Life ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to cl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
Michael John Arnold changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1282012
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #15 from Michael John Arnold ---
Issues List
===
1. License inconsistencies where the software claims to be GPL v2 licensed but
URL in LICENSE file points to GPL v3 license. Issue reported upstream.
2. Software provided by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #14 from Michael John Arnold ---
Spec URL: https://myk52348.fedorapeople.org/palo/5.1-4/palo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://myk52348.fedorapeople.org/palo/5.1-4/palo-5.1.4-0.fc23.src.rpm
Typo correction.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #13 from Michael John Arnold ---
Spec URL: https://myk52348.fedorapeople.org/palo/5.1-4/palo.spec
SRPM URL: https://myk52348.fedorapeople.org/palo/5.1-4/palo-5.1-4.fc23.src.rpm
Some updates to run the palo daemon under its own use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
myk52348's scratch build of palo-5.1.4-0.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11726846
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
Michael John Arnold changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|21 |23
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #11 from Fedora End Of Life ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 21. It is Fedora's policy to cl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
myk52348's scratch build of palo-5.1-4.fc22.src.rpm for f22 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11357362
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
myk52348's scratch build of palo-5.1-4.fc22.x86_64.rpm for f22 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11357361
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #8 from Michael John Arnold ---
Issues List
===
0. Link provided from un-versioned .so to versioned .so: I believe this is ok.
1. License inconsistencies where the software claims to be GPL v2 licensed but
URL in LICENSE f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #7 from Michael John Arnold ---
Spec URL: https://myk52348.fedorapeople.org/palo/5.1-4/palo.spec
SRPM URL: https://myk52348.fedorapeople.org/palo/5.1-4/palo-5.1-4.fc22.src.rpm
Thanks Michael. I've reviewed the output of fedora-re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
myk52348's scratch build of palo-5.1-4.fc21.src.rpm for f22 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11308524
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Review |Rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #4 from Michael ---
Ok, updated the BuildRequires and patch0 to fix the koji build issues (see
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9446037). The updated
.spec and .src.rpm have replaced the old ones, so still:
Spe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #3 from Michael ---
Thanks Jared - that allowed me to proceed with the Koji build, but am now
seeing a couple more build issues. I'll look to address those before updating
the .spec and .rpm files.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #1 from Michael ---
I've informed the upstream that I have begun the process of packaging the palo
server for fedora with the following post:
http://www.jedox.com/community/palo-forum/index.php?page=Thread&postID=18062#post18062
-
19 matches
Mail list logo