https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
puppet-3.7.5-3.fc22,rubygem-semantic-1.4.0-3.fc22,rubygem-pathspec-0.0.2-2.fc22
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/puppet-3.7.5-3.fc22,rubygem-sem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Ori
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Ken D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
--- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski ---
This is a little different, but seems to work:
* Fri Apr 10 2015 Orion Poplawski - 0.0.2-2
- Fix files
- Doc subpackage
- Run tests
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/rubygem-pathspec-0.0.2-2.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
--- Comment #3 from Ken Dreyer ---
I imported your SRPM into a Git repo so it's clearer. Here's how I recommend
handling the tests:
https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/rubygem-pathspec.git/commit/?id=2957c1fb52216a43e9b6fc94d4fd7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski ---
So, pathspec doesn't ship a spec file in the gemfile. Should I switch to
building from source for this then?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
--- Comment #1 from Ken Dreyer ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
1. Currently the %files list has the entire "%{gem_instdir
14 matches
Mail list logo
