https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #30 from Yajo ---
It seems to me that this is not necessary anymore after Docker 1.12 with its
built-in swarm mode.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #29 from Jan Chaloupka ---
https://github.com/gofed/reviews/commit/bdf9b3b2867385eba4d0829609dbbc3e7761fba0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #28 from Lokesh Mandv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(l...@redhat.com)
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Yajo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yajo@gmail.com
--- Comment #26 from Yajo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #24 from Jan Chaloupka ---
> We have processes decided by community, and just acting as if they do not
> matter when we are using our @redhat.com email reflect very badly on the
> community, cuase it send the message "we have rules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #23 from M. Scherer ---
If this is unresolved, then that shouldn't be done.
We have processes decided by community, and just acting as if they do not
matter when we are using our @redhat.com email reflect very badly on the
commun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #22 from Jan Chaloupka ---
> If you want to bundle source, shouldn't you ask first to the FPC ?
This is a long standing problem. I am trying to minimize it with better tools
and analysis of dependencies. However, at some point, th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #20 from Jan Chaloupka ---
> If you want to bundle source, shouldn't you ask first to the FPC ?
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
The fpc ticket for golang packaging is still unresolved due to API breakages.
Yes, I should a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #19 from M. Scherer ---
If you want to bundle source, shouldn't you ask first to the FPC ?
This is golang, everything is build statically, so yes, using the bundled copy
vs the non bundled one might result in a difference.
And I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #18 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: docker-swarm
Short Description: Docker-native clustering system
Upstream URL: https://github.com/docker/swarm
Owners: lsm5 jchaloup fpokor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #17 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #16 from Lokesh Mandv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #14 from Robert P. J. Day ---
Is there any ETA for docker-swarm in updates-testing?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Bug 1211517 depends on bug 1208616, which changed state.
Bug 1208616 Summary: Review Request: consul - Tool for service discovery,
monitoring and configuration http://www.consul.io
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Bug 1211517 depends on bug 1212626, which changed state.
Bug 1212626 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-samalba-dockerclient -
Docker client library in Go http://www.docker.com/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212626
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Bug 1211517 depends on bug 1212653, which changed state.
Bug 1212653 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-samuel-go-zookeeper - Native
ZooKeeper client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212653
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
M. Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msche...@redhat.com
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #12 from Jan Chaloupka ---
%if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} >= 7
%license LICENSE
%doc README.md
%else
%doc README.md LICENSE
%endif
will do the things. It is just it has to be changed in every packaged golang
project :). There is abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #11 from Michael Scherer ---
The fpc ticket show a workaround. More ugly than what I believed however, but
this can be defered for the EPEL6 package maybe ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #10 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Yeah, valid from rpm >= 4.11. F20-rawhide are fine, epel6 is not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #9 from Michael Scherer ---
That's what the guidelines say :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
But that's a quite recent addition :
http://www.rpm.org/ticket/116
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #8 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Michael thanks for reviews. Looking at [1] it states:
These prefixes are not valid in Fedora: %license and %readme.
Looks like Fedora does not use any %license tag.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #7 from M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1212626, 1212653
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: swarm - |Review Request:
|D
32 matches
Mail list logo
