[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2021-08-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344 Elder Marco changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(eldermarco@gmail. | |com)

[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2021-07-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344 Didik Supriadi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||didiksupriad...@gmail.com

needinfo canceled: [Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2020-11-12 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for Pavel Alexeev 's needinfo: Bug 1215344: Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344

[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2016-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts --- %defattr hasn't been needed since RHEL4. Group:, BuildRoot: and %clean and the first line of your %install section are also not needed at all (on any release, including EPEL5). --

[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2016-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344 --- Comment #5 from Elder Marco --- > For epel less then 7? Only epel 6 an early. Yes. EPEL 6. > If upstream do not willing do them, it is OK to package just by commits. OK. Thank you! -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2016-01-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344 Pavel Alexeev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dyske...@gmail.com

[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2015-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev --- (In reply to Elder Marco from comment #2) > Those directories belongs to plowshare package. Maybe, the package (and > plowshare) must own the directory /usr/share/plowshare/modules.

[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2015-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344 Pavel Alexeev changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1262378

[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2015-05-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344 Elder Marco elderma...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||elderma...@gmail.com

[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2015-05-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info --- Package Review == Legend: [+] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = Generic: [+]: Package is licensed

[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

2015-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW