https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215997
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215997
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215997
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215997
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Kalev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215997
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215997
--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember ---
I don't think the gnutls virtual provide would make sense here. At best it is
unnecessary, since the gnutls package itself already satisfies any deps on
"gnutls". At worst, it can lead to weird depsolving i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215997
--- Comment #2 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
If the package is for 3rd party packages which may depend on gnutls, shouldn't
it provide gnutls < 3.4.0?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215997
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215997
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nmavr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215997
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember ---
For reference, here's the diff to the current gnutls package:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/216154
I'd like to keep the diff to the original package down to the minimum in order
to be able to easily share
10 matches
Mail list logo
