https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
WARNING: Requested package name richacl doesn't match bug summary richacls
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
Andreas Gruenbacher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #13 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Gruenbacher ---
New version:
https://agruenba.fedorapeople.org/scratch/richacl-1.5-4.fc21.src.rpm
https://agruenba.fedorapeople.org/scratch/richacl.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
(In reply to Andreas Gruenbacher from comment #7)
> > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/sys
> >Requires on gl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Gruenbacher ---
Updated version:
https://agruenba.fedorapeople.org/scratch/richacl-1.5-2.fc21.src.rpm
https://agruenba.fedorapeople.org/scratch/richacl.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Gruenbacher ---
Updated version:
https://agruenba.fedorapeople.org/scratch/richacl-1.5-1.fc21.src.rpm
https://agruenba.fedorapeople.org/scratch/richacl.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Gruenbacher ---
> [!]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
> supported primary architecture.
>Koji build failed: missing dep on automake
The package did actually d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Please fix all the entries marked with [!].
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items ===
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
Andreas Gruenbacher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|puiterw...@redhat.com
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Gruenbacher ---
Created attachment 1021897
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1021897&action=edit
Updated spec file from attachment 1021896
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
Andreas Gruenbacher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1021844 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Gruenbacher ---
Created attachment 1021847
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1021847&action=edit
fedora-review report
I've added '+' signs where I think the package is fine.
The error that rpmlin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Gruenbacher ---
Created attachment 1021845
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1021845&action=edit
The spec file from inside the .src.rpm file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
Andreas Gruenbacher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||agrue...@redhat.com
--- Comment
16 matches
Mail list logo